![PROMO 64J1 Energy - Nuclear Power Science Atom - iStock - EzumeImages PROMO Energy - Nuclear Power Science Atom - iStock - EzumeImages](/sites/default/files/styles/article_sm/public/field/image/promo_64j1_energy_-_nuclear_power_science_atom_-_istock_-_ezumeimages_.jpg.webp?itok=Oqv5jnDG)
Environmental groups criticize Hanford nuclear waste cleanup plan
Click play to listen to this article.
(Washington News Service) A new agreement on plans for cleaning up nuclear waste at the Hanford site in Washington state is receiving pushback from environmental groups.
Public comment was originally scheduled to close at the beginning of August but has been extended to Sept. 1 for the Tri-Party Agreement between the U-S Energy Department, Environmental Protection Agency and Washington Department of Ecology.
Simone Anter, staff attorney and Hanford program director for the nonprofit Columbia Riverkeeper, said the new agreement means changes to the cleanup efforts including how and where the Hanford nuclear waste is stored.
![PROMO 64J1 Map - Washington State Map - iStock - klenger PROMO Map - Washington State Map - iStock - klenger](/sites/default/files/styles/max_325x325/public/promo_64j1_map_-_washington_state_map_-_istock_-_klenger.jpg.webp?itok=Ep4lOAMq)
© iStock - klenger
"If new proposals are coming out to ship either grouted or liquid nuclear waste across the region, communities deserve to know that and deserve to have a voice and deserve to be engaged," Anter contended.
The agreement for dealing with 177 underground storage tanks at Hanford took four years of closed door negotiations. Columbia Riverkeeper and other environmental groups worry the new agreement opens the door for a storage method other than vitrification, which is used to turn high-level waste into glass.
Anter noted tribal nations in the region were not consulted about the proposal. She stressed even if they could not be part of the agreement, the agencies should have been considered before it was presented to the public.
"Tribal nations are not members of the public. They are government entities and should have been treated as such," Anter pointed out.
Anter added members of the public can play a big role in how the 56 million gallons of nuclear waste at Hanford are handled.
"It's really important that all these cleanup decisions put human health, the Columbia River and the environment first," Anter asserted. "I think public comments play an enormous role in reminding the TPA agencies about this."