Farm Bill proposal would cut SNAP food assistance by $30 billion
Click play to listen to this article.
(Colorado News Connection) One proposed version of the next Farm Bill, introduced by the Republican chair of the House Agriculture Committee, would cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program by $30 billion over the next decade.
A competing Senate version introduced by the Democratic agriculture committee chair would keep benefits intact.
© Pixabay - skeeze
Carmen Mooradian, senior public policy manager for Hunger Free Colorado, said access to the program is not a partisan issue and it affects rural and urban families.
"SNAP is one of the most effective federal programs that exists to combat food insecurity and poverty," Mooradian asserted. "It's something that is used by Americans throughout this country to weather life's storms."
The House version removes a provision added to the 2018 Farm Bill which allowed benefits to be calculated in a way to consider the most current nutrition science and actual retail food prices. According to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, removing the provision would cut benefits in Colorado by $380 million.
Cutting food benefits may save money in a fiscal year but Mooradian argued it will cost taxpayers far more down the road in health care and other costs associated with poor nutrition. She added the program also contributes billions to state and local economies.
"Every SNAP dollar is returned into the economy," Mooradian pointed out. "It turns into profits for local businesses, for agricultural producers. When we stop investing in SNAP, those communities miss out."
Lawmakers extended the existing Farm Bill last year after failing to agree on a new version. The extension expires at the end of September, weeks before the General Election. Mooradian added there is still time for constituents to tell their representatives in Congress what they think.
"This is the opportunity for the community to really weigh in about the two proposals that are on the table," Mooradian urged. "And the impact that they will have on households if they pass."
